I like the overall gist of this, but worry that the alETH allocation is a bit low. Continuing with your reasoning, I counter with the following weights:
30% for bonds (ALCX/ETH SLP, ETH/alETH Curve pool, alUSD Curve pool)
a four fold increase may be too much too fast, therefore doing a split of 10% for each asset seems a bit better. We could take ETH for the alETH pair and direct it to saddle and curve accordingly. And take DAI for alUSD3CRV because it is the scarcest asset in 3CRV, giving us more bang for our buck and putting upward pressure on the peg, allowing us to increase debt limits as we approach the debt ceiling.
12% for bribes (Curve alUSD & alETH pools)
adding a little here because if we cut the current in house farm for curve alETH, we can direct it all to the curve gauge and convex. Roughly 50/50 split here.
25% for the ALCX/ETH SLP
Giving slightly more to this pool so that we don't shock the market too hard.
5% for tALCX staking
sounds good to me, best to keep an eye on it so we can increase/decrease depending on its efficacy.
15% for ALCX single-sided staking
Is good, we like our long term holders and want to reward them during the distribution phase.
3% for alETH LP
all directed to the saddle pool (whom I am still grateful to for helping us in a pinch), bribes will take care of the alETH curve pool.
10% for alUSD LP
A slightly smaller reduction but USD pegs are more sensitive in perception than ETH. Being off by more than 1% is a much smaller problem for alETH than alUSD because ETH price is inherently volatile anyway.