Rating Alchemix’s maturity with DAOmeter

Annn3

Hey Alchemix Community,

I’m Ann, the Governance Researcher on the StableLab team, and we recently launched DAOmeter, a maturity rating system for DAOs. The goal of DAOmeter is to serve as a public good by providing an effective method of evaluating and benchmarking the maturity levels of various protocols. This is achieved through a scoring system that encompasses key categories within protocols, such as Community, Voting, Documentation, Security, and more.

Based on our evaluation, Alchemix has earned a maturity score of 74%.

You received a great score in the "Documentation" category, however we noticed that delegation in Alchemix is not compensated. We also noticed that there are no working groups. Is this something you have considered implementing in the past or still considering currently?

As we’re committed to the continuous improvement and development of this tool, we’d love to hear from the broader community. Please feel free to share your thoughts, suggestions, and insights with us as we work to improve the DAOmeter scoring system.

If you want to try it, please visit here: https://www.daometer.xyz/

ov3rkoalafied

Annn3 Can you clarify what "working groups" mean? We have subDAOs - newsletter, mods, and bizgov (business development and associated proposals). They are funded through coordinape by a portion of the 20% of emissions reserved for team.

Fair point on delegation, though I don't think that matters much until we are closer to on chain governance. It is also difficult to execute in a way that isn't gameable, IMO. But I think overall making it a paid position makes more sense than not, in the long term.